Monday, November 29, 2010
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Reflections on Larry Sanger's article "Individual Knowledge in an Internet Age"
What a breath of fresh air this aritcle was for me. It truly grounded me. To read these words spoken by the co-founder of Wikipedia was even more validating. After all the reading and discussing I've been doing lately on connectivism, collaboration and reformulating our ideas of what "knowledge" is, it was great to read that Sanger believes in adhering to the basics of a liberal arts education. I particularly like this statement, "the vast body of essential facts that undergird any sophisticated understanding of the way the world works does not change rapidly" and "...unless one learns the basics in those fields, Googling a question will merely allow one to parrot an answer — not to understand it." So let's not throw out our textbooks and close down the libraries just yet. Children still need to be taught the basics of reading, writing and arithmetic. They need to know and understand a large amount of information so their brains can make sense of the new information that is coming in. Yes, the internet can be used as a tool to provide information, but teachers and classrooms with four walls still have a place in this day and age. We need to teach critical thinking skills and socialization skills; we need to impart a love of lifelong learning. This learning may come from books, the internet or actual experience. It may be done individually or with others. Hopefully, it will be a combination of all of these things. The internet is wonderful tool, when used proplerly but it will never replace teachers or the "basics" of a well rounded eduacation.
Monday, August 23, 2010
Project Based Learning
I just read an article and watched a video about project based learning. How inspirational. I have taken part in science fairs, but PBL goes even beyond that. I would love to be a part of facilitating this kind of learning. I know it's a lot of work, but the pay offs would be immense. After all, it's all for the kids!
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Reflections on George Siemens talk for TEDxNYED on Connectivism
This is an older entry that I initially wrote in my journal but didn't post. I'm trying my best to network more, so here goes.
In his talk for TEDxNYED back in March, George Siemens raised many interesting points about the way in which education on the whole is changing as a result of connectivism and the social networking of Web 2.0. Siemens claims that we need to teach children how to relate properly with each other in the online networked environment. Schools cannot “lock away” the computers or refuse to acknowledge the social network sites; we have a responsibility to teach students what they are and how to use them to improve their knowledge base. What he doesn’t go into is how to appropriately teach this new kind of communication; using networking sites to improve knowledge is a huge can of worms. I know this because of the field study I did using discussion boards last year. In the end, it was a fiasco because I had not set the parameters for proper or appropriate discussions at the start of the project. Having guidelines and expectations is a necessary thing despite the fact that the students I teach are "digital natives."
It’s great to say that students need to learn how to connect with one another in order to be better citizens of the world, but they need to be taught how to appropriately communicate as well. This really requires baby steps; I think this needs to begin in Kindergarten and continue from there on a consistent basis. As it stands right now, Siemens believes that connections have gone awry; we are not connecting with each other in schools. And this carries over into society at large.
I loved the Harvard University experiment that he spoke about where professors and graduates alike could not explain why we have seasons. Again, isn't this something that should have been taught Kindergarten? Are we really that disconnected? And what about those students who don't feel comfortable connecting with others, or who choose not to connect. They will always be a part of society. Where do they fit into this social network? This is a big topic and one that I will continue to mull over. Stay tuned.
In his talk for TEDxNYED back in March, George Siemens raised many interesting points about the way in which education on the whole is changing as a result of connectivism and the social networking of Web 2.0. Siemens claims that we need to teach children how to relate properly with each other in the online networked environment. Schools cannot “lock away” the computers or refuse to acknowledge the social network sites; we have a responsibility to teach students what they are and how to use them to improve their knowledge base. What he doesn’t go into is how to appropriately teach this new kind of communication; using networking sites to improve knowledge is a huge can of worms. I know this because of the field study I did using discussion boards last year. In the end, it was a fiasco because I had not set the parameters for proper or appropriate discussions at the start of the project. Having guidelines and expectations is a necessary thing despite the fact that the students I teach are "digital natives."
It’s great to say that students need to learn how to connect with one another in order to be better citizens of the world, but they need to be taught how to appropriately communicate as well. This really requires baby steps; I think this needs to begin in Kindergarten and continue from there on a consistent basis. As it stands right now, Siemens believes that connections have gone awry; we are not connecting with each other in schools. And this carries over into society at large.
I loved the Harvard University experiment that he spoke about where professors and graduates alike could not explain why we have seasons. Again, isn't this something that should have been taught Kindergarten? Are we really that disconnected? And what about those students who don't feel comfortable connecting with others, or who choose not to connect. They will always be a part of society. Where do they fit into this social network? This is a big topic and one that I will continue to mull over. Stay tuned.
Monday, August 16, 2010
Do I Have My Head in the Sand?
Lately I've been doing a lot of reading and listening to vodcasts about networking and networked learning. Essentially, it is the way in which individuals learn, acquire knowledge and communicate on the web these days. It has been called Web 2.0 or Classroom 2.0. It is all very interesting but I am still finding that I'm not sold on communicating with perfect strangers about anything from how to create classroom community to how to make a blueberry pie. I am a private person, and even blogging has been a challenge for me. I understand the benefits of communicating thoughts and ideas as it solidifies one's beliefs and extends one's knowledge base. Yet, I can do that by talking face to face with my colleagues and journaling in private.
George Siemens has put together very compelling vlogs on the impact of social software on learning. One of the things he says is that "our knowing increases as we externalize our knowledge." This is based on Vygotsky's theory that "words give life to thought." Basically, the more we express our ideas, the wiser we become. Isn't that what Aristotle taught as well? I see the merit in dialogue, but can't learners become knowledgeable without networking on the Internet? It worked for the Greeks.
I dread to think I have my head in the sand. I know that social networks are the way of the twenty-first century. However, right now I am not on the band wagon. I do not subscribe to Facebook, Netvibes, RSS feeds. I have a Twitter account but I never use it and I only blog infrequently. I like to think that I am aware of these sites and that is enough. Am I in denial?
George Siemens has put together very compelling vlogs on the impact of social software on learning. One of the things he says is that "our knowing increases as we externalize our knowledge." This is based on Vygotsky's theory that "words give life to thought." Basically, the more we express our ideas, the wiser we become. Isn't that what Aristotle taught as well? I see the merit in dialogue, but can't learners become knowledgeable without networking on the Internet? It worked for the Greeks.
I dread to think I have my head in the sand. I know that social networks are the way of the twenty-first century. However, right now I am not on the band wagon. I do not subscribe to Facebook, Netvibes, RSS feeds. I have a Twitter account but I never use it and I only blog infrequently. I like to think that I am aware of these sites and that is enough. Am I in denial?
Friday, August 13, 2010
My First Podcast
I'm very excited to say that I just created my very first podcast. It is not fancy at all, but being my first effort it'll do. Here is a link if you want to take a listen. It's all about proper use of discussion boards with middle schoolers. The discussion board I used was in Sharepoint. Cheers!
http://susanishimura67.podomatic.com/entry/2010-08-13T22_23_04-07_00
http://susanishimura67.podomatic.com/entry/2010-08-13T22_23_04-07_00
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
